Re: Spectrolino/SpectroScan
Re: Spectrolino/SpectroScan
- Subject: Re: Spectrolino/SpectroScan
- From: Marco Ugolini <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 11:10:30 -0700 (GMT-07:00)
In a message dated Aug 11, 2006 5:49 AM, Andrew Rodney wrote:
>I have both and the Spectrolino sits quietly under its plastic cover. Unless
>you have something very exotic to scan that needs say a polarizing filter,
>the Lino is much slower, louder and not as flexible in some respects. I
>absolutely love the i0.
The Spectroscan T also has an emissive reading function, which, so far, is missing in the iO device. But I agree that it's painfully slow, cumbersome, a pain to connect (with all its outdated cables) and noisy as heck.
>Let ProfileMaker handle the OB issues.
I'm glad to note what appears to be a growing consensus that one should try to deal with fluorescence via the profiling software rather than with UV filters.
Regards.
--------
Marco Ugolini
Mill Valley, CA
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden