Re: EyeOne Match vs PM5 CMYK profiling
Re: EyeOne Match vs PM5 CMYK profiling
- Subject: Re: EyeOne Match vs PM5 CMYK profiling
- From: Andrew Rodney <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 16:49:02 -0700
- Thread-topic: EyeOne Match vs PM5 CMYK profiling
Title: Re: EyeOne Match vs PM5 CMYK profiling
I don’t know that the current version of Match has the same (newer and updated) color engine we just got with PMP 5.0.5
Andrew Rodney
http://www.digitaldog.net/
On 2/3/06 4:46 PM, "Steve Kale" wrote:
Dan
Thanks for these comments. I guess in moving from an RGB driver to a CMYK RIP, black generation is one of the things I’ll be looking at. The issue I can functionally demo the RIP but not PM5 so taking a peek into these things is a little opaque.
Cheers
Steve
From: Dan Reid <email@hidden>
Date: 03 Feb 2006 14:11:19 -0800
To: Steve Kale <email@hidden>, colorsync <email@hidden>
Conversation: EyeOne Match vs PM5 CMYK profiling
Subject: Re: EyeOne Match vs PM5 CMYK profiling
on 2/3/06 11:16 AM, Steve Kale at email@hidden wrote:
> Does anyone know if the CMYK profile generation engine within EyeOne Match
> is the same as PM5? Obviously, it can only handle the "Easy" patch tif and
> reference file but I am thinking about demoing a CMYK RIP and was wondering
> if using Match for profile generation, albeit crude because of the low patch
> count, was a sensible window to what PM5 would achieve (which of course I
> would only buy if I stumped up for the RIP).
>
That is my understanding. Same math between both products. The Eye One Match software has predefined templates while PM5 allows more control over black generation. If you don't know or understand black generation then Eye One Match will be fine with it’s templates.
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden