• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: The gamut of digital capture
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: The gamut of digital capture


  • Subject: Re: The gamut of digital capture
  • From: bruce fraser <email@hidden>
  • Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 11:31:52 -0800

At 12:02 PM -0700 1/11/06, Andrew Rodney wrote:
I found this "interesting" and thought I'd see what others think of this
statement:

by WILL CROCKETT  UPDATED January, 2006.

The so called "native" color space, meaning the volume of color that all
DSLR's can actually record is very close to the sRGB space - certainly
smaller than Adobe RGB.  When you set a DSLR to capture in the Adobe RGB
space, it doesn't capture more color at all.  In fact, it just uses the same
color info and stretches it out into the Adobe RGB space, and struggles to
do so.

The entire piece is here (you need to make a free account and log in):
http://shootsmarter.com/infocenter/wc003.html

I'll be gentle, and simply say that this statement runs counter to my experience.


I have many examples of raw images that clip when brought into even Adobe RGB. Dark yellow-green vegetation is a prime culprit -- most RGB spaces are very deficient in dark, saturated colors in general simply because of their characteristic shape.


A link goes to a page that also states:

FACT ONE: there are no printers with a color space (aka output space) that
is larger (holding more volume of data) than sRGB.

Probably true, but not particularly relevant. I don't know of ANY printers that can't produce a yellow and a cyan that lie way outside sRGB. As in many other things, size isn't what matters-it's how the two participants (in this case, source space and destination space) work together. sRGB is a particularly poor match to the gamuts of most printing devices.

(If I were being less gentle, I'd say that someone perpetuating this misinformation is either remarkably ignorant, too lazy to do any actual objective testing, or has their own agenda that does not include education. In any case, it's irresponsible.)
--
email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden
  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: The gamut of digital capture
      • From: Roger Breton <email@hidden>
    • Re: The gamut of digital capture
      • From: Andrew Rodney <email@hidden>
References: 
 >The gamut of digital capture (From: Andrew Rodney <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: The gamut of digital capture
  • Next by Date: Re: The gamut of digital capture
  • Previous by thread: The gamut of digital capture
  • Next by thread: Re: The gamut of digital capture
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread