Re: The CIECAM challenge in ColorSync
Re: The CIECAM challenge in ColorSync
- Subject: Re: The CIECAM challenge in ColorSync
- From: Roger Breton <email@hidden>
- Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 11:57:24 -0500
> If confirmed, that is a very troubling position for Apple to take.
Those were the very words of Roger Simonov -- you can't have more Apple than
that.
> It seems
> to me that there is no future for ColorSync without some implementation of a
> color appearance model.
My thinking too. We'll see what Peter McLeod from Adobe has to say. I don't
pretend I understand everything about CIECAM but I think it's a positive
development. The ICC crowd surely has some CIECAM proponents in its ranks
but, as a whole, I suspect they have other priorities, in the short term.
> Am I wrong to think that? You seem to believe that too, Roger.
Right. I'd like to hear it from some of the HP people or MCSL? I don't know
of all the pros and cons to both systems but I, personally, like WCS
features -- no more cryptic hexadecimal profile encoding, run-time profile
binding, etc. I hope Apple will not decide NOT to implement it (or some form
of it) because they did not invent it.
> Well, I'm going off to start learning Windows now...better get used to it
> sooner than later!
Some of the better CMS packages only run under Windows. Besides, it's not
that hard. If you ever come up to Canada, I'll gladly take you for a tour.
> Marco Ugolini
Roger Breton | Laval, Canada | email@hidden
http://pages.infinit.net/graxx
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden