Re: Rip software
Re: Rip software
- Subject: Re: Rip software
- From: Marco Ugolini <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 19:11:18 -0800
In a message dated 1/30/06 5:30 PM, Jim Rich wrote:
> You are sort of are mistaken about ColorBurst.
> The part you have commented on is the Mac version.
Ah... You are correct, Jim: the version I know is the one for the Mac.
Sorry about that.
> The windows version offers multiple queues as well as a robust layout
> option.
That's not fair to us Mac users...
> So if to do a fair comparision you need to compare CB windows to XF windows.
Indeed. Very true.
> And Colorburst is by far more user friendly for calibration and profiling
> setup.
I agree that ColorBurst works very well and is less intimidating than the
Best ColorProof, which I used years ago in its 4.5 version.
To be very honest, I had a terrible time then breaking into the intricacies
of Colorproof, with all its feature-inside-feature convolutions. It took me
many days of trial and error, and of calling this and that help line to get
some straight answers.
Regards.
--------------
Marco Ugolini
Mill Valley, CA
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden