Re: Common Proofs
Re: Common Proofs
- Subject: Re: Common Proofs
- From: email@hidden
- Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 11:00:26 EDT
In a message dated 15/07/2006 15:48:52 GMT Standard Time,
email@hidden writes:
By
definition (almost) if a proof is made using characterization data
from a real press and the proof is within, say, 1 dE of that data,
then it should be capable of being matched on press. It's understood
that the press cannot likely match a proof to within 1 dE but it's
important that the proof itself be held to within a very tight
tolerance TO ITSELF so as to ensure it's within a very narrow window
of tolerance.
Terry
Arent we trying to get away from proof matches press and move to Proof =
standard (ie ISO Coated) and Press is set up so that it prints to the standard
(ie A curve TVI for CMY and B curve for K - with the ISO12747-2 Lab tagets for
the process colours) it then should match the proof visually - I am doing it all
the time and cannot understand the issues. For us to move forward to an
international standard we have to start with a common proof set up. As soon as
soft proofing becomes more stable we cannot give clients diffrent profiles
peter
|
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden