Re: Re-changing inks.
Re: Re-changing inks.
- Subject: Re: Re-changing inks.
- From: Marco Ugolini <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2006 22:49:22 -0800
In a message dated 3/1/06 10:24 PM, Michael Lithgow from Colourhead wrote:
> Marco
>
> I have a client who would like to buy GMG Dotproof as he in turn has a
> client for whom he provides banners. The client provides artwork with some
> small type and when viewed in a contone proof looks great but as the
> finished product will be printed with a 60 LPI screen the type breaks up. By
> proofing in Dotproof he can show the client how the finished product will
> really look. This is an on-going problem for him with a number of clients.
> GMG Dotproof can proof from the ripped 1 bit data for the plate maker or can
> simulate a dot if this data is not available. There are other reasons like
> moiré for printing via Dotproof but I thought this was a practical example
> of proofing with a dot.
>
> Michael
Hi Michael.
Yes, I agree that in that case a dot proof makes more sense, given the
unusual destination of the file.
What I had in mind, though, are situations of the more standard variety, say
SWOP (133 lpi, web-coated offset, etc.). In that case, I would find it hard
to say that a dot proof is absolutely and unequivocally indispensable.
Regards.
--------------
Marco Ugolini
Mill Valley, CA
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
| References: | |
| | >Re-changing inks. (From: "Michael Lithgow from Colourhead" <email@hidden>) |