• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: CTP - reduced dot
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: CTP - reduced dot


  • Subject: Re: CTP - reduced dot
  • From: Bret Hesler <email@hidden>
  • Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2006 12:03:38 -0500
  • Thread-topic: CTP - reduced dot

Yes. We did one of the runs for the GRACoL committee at 175LS with linear
plates, and had around 1% move at the midtone to get the GRACoL tone curve.
We recently put in a new press and ran the test at 200LS and got almost
exactly the same results. Our inks matched the solid LAB values from ISO
12647-2.

Bret Hesler
L.P. Thebault Company


On 3/8/06 10:59 AM, "Jon Crook" <email@hidden> wrote:

> Are you able to achieve gray balance and still get GRACoL 7 lab values for
> CMYK while getting a plate curve that is close to linear?
>
>
> On 3/8/06 9:20 AM, "Bret Hesler" <email@hidden> wrote:
>
>> Our inks are relatively low in Tack. It reduces the problems with picking,
>> and allows us to get relatively close to legacy midtone gain values with
>> plates that are close to linear.
>>
>> Bret Hesler
>> L.P. Thebault Company
>>
>>
>> On 3/8/06 9:11 AM, "Jon Crook" <email@hidden> wrote:
>>
>>> We are also running to GRACoL 7 but what you run to depends on what your
>>> intentions are. If you want to match legacy work then you would want to
>>> achieve the lab values, densities, and the appropriate dot gain as to what
>>> you where running before you went CTP. I have found that GRACol 7 is much
>>> easier to maintain than our legacy specs so any reprints that come through
>>> get a new proof for approval. In my experience, linear plates seem to look
>>> pretty flat on press
>>>
>>>
>>> On 3/8/06 7:16 AM, "Bret Hesler" <email@hidden> wrote:
>>>
>>>> We run curved plates to match the GRACoL 7 tone curve. When we switched to
>>>> digital halftone proofing and CTP, our legacy standard was Analog
>>>> waterproof. Three years ago, we lowered the dot gain targets to match the
>>>> GRACoL 6 spec, around 20%. Now with the GRACoL 7 targets, our plates are
>>>> near linear, and dot gains are in the mid to high teens.
>>>>
>>
>>  _______________________________________________
>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>> Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>>
>> This email sent to email@hidden

 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

References: 
 >Re: CTP - reduced dot (From: Jon Crook <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: CTP - reduced dot
  • Next by Date: Re: CTP - reduced dot
  • Previous by thread: Re: CTP - reduced dot
  • Next by thread: Re: CTP - reduced dot
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread