Lists

Terms and Conditions
Lists hosted on this site
Email the Postmaster
Tips for posting to public mailing lists

Re: [TAN] Is saturated blue inherently dark?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [TAN] Is saturated blue inherently dark?

Subject: Re: [TAN] Is saturated blue inherently dark?
From: Giordano Galli <email@hidden>
Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 17:46:31 +0200

On May 6, 2006, at 10:40 PM, Roger Breton wrote:

Or did I miss your point?


On the contrary, you're right on the spot!

what does [TAN] stands for?


'Tangential'.


Thank you a lot.


giordano
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden



References:  
  >Re: [TAN] Is saturated blue inherently dark? (From: Roger Breton <email@hidden>)




Prev by Date:
Re: [TAN] Is saturated blue inherently dark?

Next by Date:
Re: [TAN] Is saturated blue inherently dark?

Previous by thread:
Re: [TAN] Is saturated blue inherently dark?

Next by thread:
Re: [TAN] Is saturated blue inherently dark?

Index(es):

Date
Thread