• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: RIMM/ROMM and ProPhoto
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: RIMM/ROMM and ProPhoto


  • Subject: Re: RIMM/ROMM and ProPhoto
  • From: Richard Wagner <email@hidden>
  • Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2006 20:48:18 -0500


On Nov 4, 2006, at 7:03 PM, Chris Cox wrote:

The version 4 versus version 2 explains the differences you're seeing.

The ProPhoto profile was created earlier because the version 4 specification
did not exist when ROMM was renamed ProPhoto for mass consumption.

So at that time ROMM-RGB was v2 as well... so ProPhoto was certainly not created/renamed from the current incarnation of ROMM-RGB. There was a clear divergence of the two profiles at some point in time. Even the profile creation software was different.


ROMM and ProPhoto are still the same, but the interpretation of the profile versions differs slightly.

It appears to be more than just the ICC version, and "the same" applies only in a general sense. Someone had a clear, specific reason for the changes between the two profiles, ICC versions aside.


Actually, Adobe uses the ProPhoto V2 profile internally in ACR.

Well, Thomas Knoll has stated that ACR uses RIMM/ROMM, not a v2 ProPhoto. Why would Photoshop install ROMM-RGB for internal use (not with the profiles generally available to users) if it was not used internally? It is also clearly Adobe's profile. I guess the best test would be to install a whacked-out ROMM-RGB and see what happens, but I haven't gone that far.


ProPhoto is not outdated, it's just a V2 profile.

Fine, but it's not a V4 ROMM-RGB, either, nor does it have the rendering intents of ROMM-RGB.


You're making a big mountain out of a rather tiny molehill here.

In addition to trying to unravel the real history behind ROMM-RGB/ ProPhoto, I'm trying to find the best way to convert ProPhoto masters to other colorspaces like sRGB. RelCol conversions are often less than ideal. Converting to ROMM-RGB, and then to sRGB using Perceptual with BPC often seems to give a better conversion. Simply changing the output in ACR from ProPhoto to sRGB is identical to doing a RelCol conversion after-the-fact. The best way to get sRGB conversions from ACR is to specifically optimize an image in ACR for sRGB (this was confirmed with Thomas Knoll), but that is a lot of work, and it will also kill the settings for ProPhoto, as ACR cannot save multiple sets of settings. I don't see this as a tiny molehill.


Thanks for your thoughts on this, Chris.

--Rich Wagner
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: RIMM/ROMM and ProPhoto
      • From: Chris Cox <email@hidden>
    • Re: RIMM/ROMM and ProPhoto
      • From: Richard Wagner <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: RIMM/ROMM and ProPhoto (From: Chris Cox <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: RIMM/ROMM and ProPhoto
  • Next by Date: Re: RIMM/ROMM and ProPhoto
  • Previous by thread: Re: RIMM/ROMM and ProPhoto
  • Next by thread: Re: RIMM/ROMM and ProPhoto
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread