Re: Rel vs Abs proofs
Re: Rel vs Abs proofs
- Subject: Re: Rel vs Abs proofs
- From: email@hidden
- Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 21:25:05 +0200
On Oct 13, 2006, at 20:13 PM, Marco Ugolini wrote:
In a message dated 10/13/06 1:25 AM, email@hidden wrote:
Dot size/Resolution is not the problem. There are simply not enough
dots which also are widely dispersed. Annoyingly visible.
Are we going a bit overboard here? "Annoyingly visible" if you know
that the
white is simulated and make it a point of obsessing over that and
looking at
it very close up, perhaps -- but to the average or even above-average
client? I doubt that very much.
Au contraire. The problem is that such whites are usually comprised
of something like yellow plus the tiniest amount of either magenta or
cyan. This then becomes annoying because the cyan or magenta dots
become too dispersed. This also means they do not contribute to the
overall color appearance which makes matching simply impossible. But
granted, perhaps it does introduce desirable speckles :-).
simulate a somewhat realistic white point. A bit off this way or that
doesn't sound like a true dealbreaker to me.
Perhaps, but this is a 10degr. observer problem. Which basically
means we do not have the slightest idea how to codify the color-
error. I recently bought a kitchen. There is a visible red-green
difference between front elements. So I grab the old spectrometer.
Turns out there is a 0.3 delta E difference...
Regards,
Oscar Rysdyk
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden