• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Subject: Re: SWOP Reference Profile
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Subject: Re: SWOP Reference Profile


  • Subject: Re: Subject: Re: SWOP Reference Profile
  • From: Louis Dery <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2006 23:10:50 -0400

I agree with you Ray,

with such product (proofing media), generic ICC paper profile would be a "good starting point". Some detailed documentation have to be provided with it. Only ICC profiles, without information specific to printer settings and "options" would be useless.

Pierre,
If you are looking for professional help and tools, let us know!

Louis Dery
v.p. Nouvelles Technologies / New Technologies
TGLC inc.
www.tglc.com (new web site look and info)
email@hidden
418-877-9114

______________________________
Ray Maxwell wrote:

Hi Pierre,

You are half way to an interesting product.

Produce ICC profiles for your papers with popular printer and Ink combinations and I believe that many printers will be very interested.

Most of the people producing papers for art prints are also listing profiles for their papers on their web sites.

Ray


Pierre Ferland wrote:
> We produce inkjet proofing media made from the same paper stocks used on press, effectively eliminating the need to emulate the paper stock with ink. Using our patent-pending methods and coatings, we convert popular press grades for inkjet proofing without altering their appearance (0.4-0.8 DeltaE between the original stock and the inkjet-coated version).
>  
> This has several benefits, among others the fact that it's now possible to print on, using standard inkjet proofing methods, paper stock loaded with optical brighteners (SAPPI McCoy, for example) and different substrate finishes (C1S gloss, satin offset, linerboard and CCNB mottling, etc.).
>  
> Please don't think I'm just trying to pitch my product. As we are a start-up company we need to know how you color experts see this effecting the standardization process? Is it a plus? Am I throwing a wrench in the spokes of color management? Will it make things simpler only for certain users?
>  
> The opinions of this users list are much appreciated.
>  
> Pierre Ferland
> TWP International Inc.
> eMail: email@hidden
> Web Site: www.twproof.com

_____________________________




 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

  • Prev by Date: Re: Subject: Re: SWOP Reference Profile
  • Next by Date: MonacoPROFILER and UV
  • Previous by thread: Re: Subject: Re: SWOP Reference Profile
  • Next by thread: MonacoPROFILER and UV
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread