• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: TIL on press
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: TIL on press


  • Subject: Re: TIL on press
  • From: Busher Jr Richard C <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 08:41:32 -0700

Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 21:26:34 -0400
From: Roger Breton <email@hidden>
Subject: Re: TIL on press

How can I determine TIL on a press?
Appreciate any feedback.
Faro

Two deciding factors come to mind : a) drying time and b) shadow detail.

Other factors are paper quality, press capability, press operator capabilities.


I often print with 380% TIL on premium/#1 coated sheets. That 380% refers to the maximum black in a photographic image or illustration. I also create "rich" black backgrounds with up to 347% (92.80.75.100 cmyk).

In addition, with a few top printers, I can push the ink densities on press. I have often printed with wet ink densities of k = 230, c & m = 1.80, y = 1.30. The screening is Stochastic, usually 10 microns. This requires modified plate curves to account for additional dot gain in the 3/4 tones.

Both higher TIL and ink densities require skilled and motivated press operators because the ink/water balance is more critical and the powder adjustment is also more critical. However the results can be stunning if done correctly.

On some presses, too much ink causes production delays because the sheet
remains wet for prolonged periods. So ink drying must be taken into
consideration when deciding TIL.

True. Using an aqueous coating to seal the sheet will speed up turn around time. However I have found the aqueous coating sometimes does not work with heavy rich black backgrounds.


If ink drying is not a problem then I look at the point of diminishing
returns. By measuring increasing TIL targets (280%, 300%, 320% ...) it's
possible to tell where further addition of ink is not worth.


This being said, I use 320% for sheetfed offset and 300% for web offset.

For projects where I am not doing all of the prepress, or where I am not involved in the press check I stick with numbers similar to Roger's numbers above.


Keep in mind, too, that 350% TIL is not a disaster per se, as long as it's
not use all over the sheet.


Roger Breton  |  Laval, Canada  |  email@hidden
http://pages.infinit.net/graxx

Dick Busher Cosgrove Editions email@hidden

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


  • Prev by Date: Re: MonacoPROFILER and UV
  • Next by Date: Re: MonacoPROFILER and UV
  • Previous by thread: Re: TIL on press
  • Next by thread: Re: TIL on Press
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread