Re: Metamerism vs Color Constancy - No! Again? [Was: To UV or not]
Re: Metamerism vs Color Constancy - No! Again? [Was: To UV or not]
- Subject: Re: Metamerism vs Color Constancy - No! Again? [Was: To UV or not]
- From: Marco Ugolini <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 23:43:39 -0700
In a message dated 9/22/06 8:16 AM, Graeme Gill wrote:
> Bob Frost wrote:
>
>> Why not correct them then? That is what Wikepedia is all about!
>
> I've given it a go, but the majority of popular references to "metamerism"
> are wrong, so it's easy for someone to revert it back again,
> thinking that they understand it.
That's exactly the problem in a nutshell. I have made corrections to
Wikipedia entries, only to see them reverted in very short order by some
anonymous "correctness police", i.e., people on a mission to make others as
dumb as they are.
End of mini-rant.
--------------
Marco Ugolini
Mill Valley, CA
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden