Re: Paper Print Resolution
Re: Paper Print Resolution
- Subject: Re: Paper Print Resolution
- From: "edmund ronald" <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 01:48:09 +0200
Obviously you'd be in a position to know. That it happens at high
resolutions is plausible . Printing as a stochastic process :)
Edmund
On 4/18/07, Robert L Krawitz <email@hidden> wrote:
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 01:18:30 +0200
From: "edmund ronald" <email@hidden>
Historically, slightly less sharp. Quite possibly this piece of
advice is, like the rest of me, skightly outdated :)
My experience has been that on newer Epson printers bidirectional
printing is actually *sharper* than unidirectional printing; in many
cases, that's even true at extremely high resolutions (5760x2880).
> Also, I have always used Bi-Directional printing (High Speed). I have
> never ever been able to discern an iota of difference with it on or
> off, although I never bothered to test this with my 4800s. This was
> always the case with my other printers. I don't understand the
> warning about using the High Speed setting. I am curious as to the
> reasoning behind the warning.
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden