Re: U-DACT tests for informal comparison of Eye-One Pro and DTP94
Re: U-DACT tests for informal comparison of Eye-One Pro and DTP94
- Subject: Re: U-DACT tests for informal comparison of Eye-One Pro and DTP94
- From: Roger Breton <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2007 10:58:40 -0500
That's interesting Martin.
> I had an Eizo on test here about 18 months back. It couldn't do cyan
> either.
>
> That's why I think that pushing monitors to fit AdobeRGB is a waste of
> time.
I have access to a CG221 too and I'll see what kind of results I can come up
with doing the same experiment, put up 100C ISO Coated value on screen in
Photoshop, take a measurement with an i1 and compare to the standard value.
> AdobeRGB hasn't a big enough gamut to handle 100% cyan used on sheet
> fed litho.
ProPhoto then? Or why bother in the first place? Suppose one just do CMYK
soft proofing. Take the majority of monitors on the market, let's throw in
the CG221 in the mix. Then why bother with AdobeRGB alltogether since the
U-DACT will show huge DeltaEs (17 for the i1 and 11 for the Optix your
reports show) for the 100% cyan anyway? We could do away with sRGB-type of
gamuts monitor and go on with life as not even the supposedly wide gamut
beasts are not even capable of showing us 100% Cyan under 17 or 11 deltaE.
Do you see my point?
I know it's ludicrous. There's gotta be a better explanation.
Roger Breton
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden