• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Device Link Profiles
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Device Link Profiles


  • Subject: Re: Device Link Profiles
  • From: Terry Wyse <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 19:01:29 -0500


On Jan 9, 2007, at 6:37 PM, Lee Blevins wrote:

I have now encountered several devices with rips that make what they
call "device link profiles."

I doubt if the *RIP* is making the device link profile (DLP). Device links are usually built by a 3rd party app such as a standard profiling application (both Monaco and ProfileMaker can create DLPs) or dedicated DLP creation software such as Link-o-later. But many workflow RIPs and proofing RIPs (less so with proofing RIPs) have support for DLPs.




From what I can see these are a record of device settings with respect
to what reference profile is being use, what destination profile is
being used and information about rendering intents, device linearity,
etc.

My question is:

Are they consistent in what items are controlled by a device link
profile or is the a decision made by the programmers of the software?

DLP creation software tends to have as many or more items to control than even standard ICC profiles. What each software allows you to control can be quite varied. You can have anything from a device link that behaves no differently than a normal ICC transform to device links that control black channel integrity as well as primary and secondary purity.



Is there an ISO standard Device link profile is what I guess I'm asking?

Don't see how there could be since the destination device, almost by definition, is unknown. Typical use in an offset printing environment would be have a device link that converts from "standard" CMYK spaces such as SWOP or GRACoL to your specific press conditions. This would effectively force your press to print or behave like SWOP/GRACoL much more elegantly than using simple plate curves.


The only place I could see "standard" device links being created or used would be for straight re-purposing between several common CMYK press spaces (SWOP->GRACoL, Newsprint->SWOP and of course visa-versa).


Regards, Terry Wyse

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


References: 
 >Device Link Profiles (From: email@hidden (Lee Blevins))

  • Prev by Date: Device Link Profiles
  • Next by Date: Re: Device Link Profiles
  • Previous by thread: Device Link Profiles
  • Next by thread: Re: Device Link Profiles
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread