• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: linearization - luminance, chroma or density?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: linearization - luminance, chroma or density?


  • Subject: Re: linearization - luminance, chroma or density?
  • From: Ray Maxwell <email@hidden>
  • Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 14:07:09 -0800

Marco,

I agree with you.

All that is necessary, is to do an a* vs b* plot of step wedges for each color.  From this you can clearly see when you have achived maximum chroma.  Moving beyond this point is folly.  You cannot get a larger gamut than this point.  You are only adding muddy density beyound this point.

Ray Maxwell


Marco Ugolini wrote:
In a message dated 1/21/07 12:07 PM, Roger Breton wrote:

  
Personally, I don't feel one approach is all that superior to others
although I always liked GlobalGraphics approach more than the others
(ProofReady Plug-in used with SetGold). In the end, I'm always surprised to
see that good color matching results can be had despite what seems like poor
results out of some RIP's linearization procedures.
    


Personally, as a non-color-scientist, I suspect that chroma-based
linearization is the way to go, because I have seen density-based procedures
go too far and end up cutting some of the available saturation in the output
(specially the procedures that are based on visual evaluation, as opposed to
measurement-based).

Whereas it would seem to me that limiting the ink at the point just before
one starts to detect a decrease in chroma would guarantee the highest
saturation achievable in a given device. That way, the device will perform
at the peak of its color gamut while avoiding the pitfalls of excessive ink
amounts (first and foremost being the tortured profiles that usually
result).

I would be interested in hearing the opinion of other colleagues.

Regards.

Marco Ugolini


 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

  
 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: linearization - luminance, chroma or density?
      • From: Graeme Gill <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: linearization - luminance, chroma or density? (From: Marco Ugolini <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: linearization - luminance, chroma or density?
  • Next by Date: Re: linearization - luminance, chroma or density?
  • Previous by thread: Re: linearization - luminance, chroma or density?
  • Next by thread: Re: linearization - luminance, chroma or density?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread