Re: some further thoughts on the Z3100
Re: some further thoughts on the Z3100
- Subject: Re: some further thoughts on the Z3100
- From: "edmund ronald" <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:42:34 +0100
I believe people who use Monaco Profiler and like it should be very
vocal that the technology be preserved within the new Xrite. Otherwise
they will be forced to use the PMP rendering in the end.
On 1/31/07, Clark Omholt <email@hidden> wrote:
(I'm posting this for Julian, who is having difficulty getting his
submissions accepted. -- Clark)
I compared two profiles, one built from the APS and the other
from Monaco Profiler using a DTP-70, and in Colorthink you would not be
able to discern any differences in the gamut plots. However the prints
they yielded displayed some noticeable differences, with the Monaco
profile showing smoother transitions and better shadow detail.
No surprises here.
I fully
expect that APS results will improve as the software evolves. An
interesting feature of the APS is the ability to export measured data as
a text file to be imported into a 3rd party profiling package. I'm
currently testing this option. This not only allows for more flexibility
in profile creation, but if the patches were printed on another printer
they could be read on the HP and you could create a profile using your
existing profiling package. I'll post some gamut comparisons in the next
few days.
It will be interesting to see what happens when you run the files read
by the instrument in the printer through Monaco Profiler.
-Regards
Julian Mussi
email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden