Re: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 4, Issue 246
Re: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 4, Issue 246
- Subject: Re: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 4, Issue 246
- From: Martin Orpen <email@hidden>
- Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2007 22:44:48 +0100
On 8 Jul 2007, at 21:43, Andrew Rodney wrote:
Actually I'm in total agreement. I only wish your email could make
it over
to that other list discussing (poorly like here) the article by
Karl Lang
[Rendering the Print], which started this series of posts.
What's to discuss?
The article is well written and explains the reasons why those who
want control shouldn't be shooting jpegs.
If there is anything surprising or controversial in the paper then I
doubt that it would surprise shock many subscribers to either this
list or Dan's.
But, let's not forget, that these Technical Papers are Adobe
marketing materials.
They are commissioned and published because they are totally
congruent with Adobe's view of the current state of the technology
and its future and because they raise Adobe's reputation.
If the paper suggested that C1 Pro or Nikon Capture did a better job
than Photoshop or Lightroom then I'd be keen on discussing it further.
--
Martin Orpen
<http://www.pro-imaging.org/> International support for professional
image makers
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden