Re: Apple/Adobe Imaging, DAM and Workflow
Re: Apple/Adobe Imaging, DAM and Workflow
- Subject: Re: Apple/Adobe Imaging, DAM and Workflow
- From: Nick Dunmur <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 16:38:05 +0100
- Thread-topic: Apple/Adobe Imaging, DAM and Workflow
On 17/7/07 14:41, "Andrew Rodney" wrote:
> Bottom line is, these profiles are really good and few need pay
> for custom profiles for the same papers and pro printers.
I guess that depends on which market we're talking about. I think Edmund has
it right when he says,
> - For printers, it is clear that canned profiles are mostly ok, when
> you have them. All my clients use third party papers and request
> profiles for these.
>
> - For screens it's sadly obvious that canned profiles are as of now
> mostly hopeless, but with one or two over-marketed exceptions
> calibrators work as sold.
>
> - For cameras, default calibration is good enough unless you have
> trained eyes. If you have trained eyes you will get uncomfortable with
> default renderings. We can argue about how this can be solved.
That sums it up for me as a photographer, and for the market that I am part
of. It is also necessary to embrace Edmund's points if one is competing on a
professional level and always looking for a point of differentiation between
oneself and one's competitors.
Best
Nick
--
Nick Dunmur - photographer
Nottingham,UK
+441159509685
info<at>nickdunmur.com
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden