• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Evaluation of Color Difference Formulas
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Evaluation of Color Difference Formulas


  • Subject: Re: Evaluation of Color Difference Formulas
  • From: Klaus Karcher <email@hidden>
  • Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 21:48:55 +0200

dpascale wrote:
[...] there is a concensus in the scientific community that the CIEDE2000 color difference formula is the best... ...on average.

... on average color differences? on average viewing conditions? or both?

Do you think color difference formulas with additional parameters that
account for different viewing conditions (like CAMs) could be useful in
this context?

Can you tell anything about
<http://www.imaging.org/store/epub.cfm?abstrid=22169> or
<http://www.iscc.org/ISCC2007/abstracts/T11IG1_Xue.pdf> ?

http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/abstract/94518332/ABSTRACT
thanks :)

You have seen, I have seen, and many others have also noticed, that all formulas "fail" at some point or another, either when looking at a display or comparing print samples. However, it is dangerous to globalize a formula quality by sporadic exposure to "bad" cases, as we tend to forget the other, usually much more numerous, cases, where we take the formula results and agree with them without questioning.

I am aware of this danger and I can't rate whether Timo Autiokari's examples are a collection of sporadic bad cases or point out systematic errors.

Anyway -- the first time I looked on a image with color pairs ordered by
DE00, I was very astonished how bad this sequence corresponded with my
perception -- see <http://digitalproof.info/FOGRA39/fo27vs39.tif> (1,9MB
Lab-TIFF). I assumed it was because of 8-bit quantization errors, gamut
issues, simultaneous contrast or any other of these countless color
appearance mysteries.

But now I see a new aspect: Maybe Phenomena like the Hunt Effect
(colorfulness increases with luminance), the Stevens Effect (contrast
increases with luminance) and the Helmholtz-Kohlrausch Effect
(brightness depends on cromaticity) affect the validity of Color
Difference Formulas in different viewing conditions more than I expected.

Are there any studies about it? (I guess there are).

Regards,
Klaus


_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: This email sent to email@hidden
  • Follow-Ups:
    • The DeltaE 2000 color difference formula [was: Evaluation of Color Difference Formulas]
      • From: Marco Ugolini <email@hidden>
    • Re: Evaluation of Color Difference Formulas
      • From: "dpascale" <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Evaluation of Color Difference Formulas (From: Klaus Karcher <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Evaluation of Color Difference Formulas (From: "dpascale" <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Evaluation of Color Difference Formulas
  • Next by Date: Re: Evaluation of Color Difference Formulas
  • Previous by thread: Re: Evaluation of Color Difference Formulas
  • Next by thread: Re: Evaluation of Color Difference Formulas
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread