• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Linear-light RAW 12bit vs R'G'B' 8bit: how much better is it really?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Linear-light RAW 12bit vs R'G'B' 8bit: how much better is it really?


  • Subject: Re: Linear-light RAW 12bit vs R'G'B' 8bit: how much better is it really?
  • From: Roger Breton <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:36:10 -0400

>> 1) I had heard that the tonal response of ink on paper was closer to
>> 1.8 gamma.
>
> My understanding too (from Karl Lang who built ColorMatch RGB's TRC for that
> reason).
>
> Andrew Rodney

Is there such thing as an "absolute" tonal response of ink on paper?

Roger Breton


 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

References: 
 >Re: Linear-light RAW 12bit vs R'G'B' 8bit: how much better is it really? (From: Andrew Rodney <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Linear-light RAW 12bit vs R'G'B' 8bit: how much better is it really?
  • Next by Date: Gamma
  • Previous by thread: Re: Linear-light RAW 12bit vs R'G'B' 8bit: how much better is it really?
  • Next by thread: Re: Linear-light RAW 12bit vs R'G'B' 8bit: how much better is it really?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread