• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: DTP70 - 2 step or not 2 step?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: DTP70 - 2 step or not 2 step?


  • Subject: Re: DTP70 - 2 step or not 2 step?
  • From: Scott Martin <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 23:27:31 -0500


On Jul 31, 2007, at 1:32 PM, Steve Upton wrote:

BTW, I hate to call it linearization since it doesn't directly
linearize the printer prior to profiling. I like "device customized
profile target generation" but I'm open to other, shorter ideas...

Isn't the process properly called "pre-linearization"?

actually I prefer to call it adaptive targeting.

I like that! But what you are talking about is slightly different. Just like generic targets, Bill's 9600 adapted targets end up getting used for all kind of devices, not just 9600s. Adapting the target for each device at the time of profiling with a 2 step process is key. Nonetheless, I like your "adaptive targeting" termonology.


Scott Martin
www.on-sight.com




_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: This email sent to email@hidden
References: 
 >Re: DTP70 - 2 step or not 2 step? (From: Marco Ugolini <email@hidden>)
 >Re: DTP70 - 2 step or not 2 step? (From: Steve Upton <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: New line of Epson inkjets
  • Next by Date: Re: New line of Epson inkjets
  • Previous by thread: Re: DTP70 - 2 step or not 2 step?
  • Next by thread: Proofline Papers
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread