• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Color management for HDTV and Final Cut Pro (Ray Maxwell)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Color management for HDTV and Final Cut Pro (Ray Maxwell)


  • Subject: Re: Color management for HDTV and Final Cut Pro (Ray Maxwell)
  • From: William Hollingworth <email@hidden>
  • Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2007 11:11:58 -0500

Hi Tom

Great reply.

I'd just like to add a couple of comments since I'm starting to see more and more confusion related to this issue now that people are doing more software based desktop video editing:

You are very correct that in a traditional video-to-video workflow, "color management" isn't normally necessary, since it can be assumed that each piece of equipment in the workflow knows is working in a standard color video workspace. There are some minor color conversions done such as when transcoding NTSC<>PAL/SECAM due to the slightly different color primaries of each standard.

However that starts to fall apart when people start to use standard desktop computer monitors and laptop displays for previewing output on the desktop, instead of using a dedicated external broadcast standard preview monitor. Most laptop displays have very small color gamuts (much smaller than sRGB), and desktop computer monitors have increasingly larger color gamuts as the technology improves and prices drop.

To make things worse, there exists a lot of confusion in the industry about color gamuts and their relationship to broadcast video, specifically NTSC. With the push for ever larger display gamuts, marketing folks have started to list display color gamuts as a % size or % coverage of NTSC for comparison purposes. Unfortunately this practice leads some to believe that a monitor with a % value closer to 100% *must* be better for use with NTSC video.

In reality this is of course not true because the color gamut used for modern day NTSC video has nothing to do with the original "NTSC 1953" spec, which actually had a very large (and unachievable with the display technology at the time) color gamut - even larger than Adobe RGB. It is however the NTSC 1953 spec that often gets quoted in marketing materials.

For previewing NTSC video on a display monitor without any display color management by the host application/OS, it would be much better to use a standard sRGB display rather than one with a larger or smaller color gamut, since the primaries for sRGB are the same as HDTV primaries and are very close to SMPTE-C primaries used in NTSC video.

It's interesting to see all of the "wide gamut" consumer TVs that are starting to show up in the marketplace due to the increased use of LED backlights and improved color filters and phosphors. While they may look brilliant in terms of amazing color gamut, technically they are producing images that are out of spec in relation to the intended output gamut. I suspect though that the average consumer probably doesn't care and actually prefers the resulting super-saturated images they produce.

Getting back to Ray's original question though, I am not aware if Final Cut Pro or other video editing applications are capable of honoring the display's ICC profile when previewing video on the desktop in order to correctly render color corrected motion video to the screen. My suggestion would be to calibrate the display to be as close to HDTV/sRGB as possible (D65 white point, etc.). Ideally a dedicated external professional broadcast grade preview monitor would be used for final output confirmation.

As an aside: In order to try and reduce the confusion of display color gamuts and their relationship to NTSC, NEC typically lists the display gamut as a % size and % coverage of both Adobe RGB and NTSC 1953 in marketing materials, along with a disclaimer explaining the use of the NTSC 1953 spec. Ideally the NTSC comparison would go away, but unfortunately it has become a display industry standard benchmark.

Best regards

Will Hollingworth
NEC Display Solutions

At 02:02 PM 6/4/2007, email@hidden wrote:
From: tom lianza <email@hidden>
Subject: Color management for HDTV and Final Cut Pro (Ray Maxwell)
To: email@hidden
Message-ID: <email@hidden>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

Hi to all,

The issue of color management for HDTV is an interesting topic.  I'd
like to take a few moments to give you some background that relates to
why you don't find "color management" and particularly why you don't
find ICC color management in general practice in this industry.

_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: This email sent to email@hidden
  • Prev by Date: Re: Question Xerox Phaser 7760
  • Next by Date: Re: v4 profiles and PRMG
  • Previous by thread: Re: Color management for HDTV and Final Cut Pro (Ray Maxwell)
  • Next by thread: v4 profiles and PRMG
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread