Re: EyeOne Accuracy for FOGRA Proof Verification
Re: EyeOne Accuracy for FOGRA Proof Verification
- Subject: Re: EyeOne Accuracy for FOGRA Proof Verification
- From: "Dan Wilson.com" <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 18:35:17 +0100
- Thread-topic: EyeOne Accuracy for FOGRA Proof Verification
Hi Thomas,
Is the new dH tolerance in the 12647-7 proposed Standard specification, or
is it a Fogra proof verification/implementation tolerance?
Thanks.
Regards,
Dan Wilson
--
G7 Certified Expert
--
Prepress I.T. Limited
Dublin, Ireland
Dublin +353 (0)85768 2733
www.prepress-it.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Message: 11
> Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 09:57:02 +0200
> From: Thomas Holm/pixl <email@hidden>
> Subject: Re: EyeOne Accuracy for FOGRA Proof Verification
> To: Joseph Yates <email@hidden>
> Cc: ColorSync Users Mailing List <email@hidden>
> Message-ID: <email@hidden>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
>
>
> On 12/06/2007, at 2.30, Joseph Yates wrote:
>> For example I've gotten deviations of between 4.44 - 4.87 on the
>> Max Primary patch
>>
SNIP>
> It may not be, but there is a caveat. The numbers state that the
> primaries SHOULD be under 2.5 and SHALL be under 5 - so regardless of
> the deviance your measurements are borderline. Also in the ISO
> 12647-7 there are some new dH tolerances which should be observed -
> so you may want to upgrade your verifications software to a version
> taking these latest tolerances into account.
>
> Med Venlig Hilsen
>
> Thomas Holm / Pixl Aps
> --
>
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden