Re: Shadow detail - printer profiles
Re: Shadow detail - printer profiles
- Subject: Re: Shadow detail - printer profiles
- From: Derek Cooper <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 09:29:19 -0400
On May 9, 2007, at 4:19 PM, Terry Wyse wrote:
Took the words right out of my mouth in regards to using a
polarization filter. I don't know about canvas, but a pol filter
can do wonders when measuring very "low-gamut" substrates such as
uncoated/matte fine art type papers.
Ah, but this substrate is a very high gamut canvas, so in discussions
with a more knowledgeable tech at GMB, they confirmed that the
spectrolino with pol won't do the trick.
An alternate approach would be to create a custom testchart with
larger than normal patches so perhaps the iO would grab a better
"average" across each patch. The texture would still be there of
course but perhaps you'd get more of the "right" readings across a
larger patch. Just a thought.
Doesn't do the trick either, in this case. A similar approach is to
patch read, 1 read, the entire target twice, then compare the two
readings in Measure. My findings - both readings are incredibly
close. So, the spectro is consistently reading the darks and having
the same problems.
Derek
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden