• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
PNG
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

PNG


  • Subject: PNG
  • From: Michael Papet <email@hidden>
  • Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 08:46:53 -0700 (PDT)

> Photoshop does the best it can given the current
> interpretation of the PNG
> "standard". But in between just about every release
> somebody updates,
> reinterprets, or points out why you can't even use
> the standard definitions.

1. I feel your frustration that open standards are
open to interpretation. There's probably limited
demand from your customers anyway, so it gets little
attention.

2. Maybe Photoshop isn't the best tool for the job in
this situation?  Imagemagick
(http://www.imagemagick.org/script/index.php) is an
excellent tool for this kind of task with very good
color control.  A perl script does the grunt work.

Michael




____________________________________________________________________________________
Food fight? Enjoy some healthy debate
in the Yahoo! Answers Food & Drink Q&A.
http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545367
 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: PNG
      • From: Steve Upton <email@hidden>
  • Prev by Date: Re: ISO 12647-7
  • Next by Date: Re: basic color
  • Previous by thread: Re: Printer profiling software
  • Next by thread: Re: PNG
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread