• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Accuray of EyeOnePro
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Accuray of EyeOnePro


  • Subject: Re: Accuray of EyeOnePro
  • From: Marco Ugolini <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 08:53:41 -0700 (GMT-07:00)

Roger Breton wrote:

>That's the kind of statement I'm after from X-Rite on the i1pro. But,
>I suspect for marketing reasons, we'll never see those specs published
>anywhere -- it is not even in the SDK!

Hi Roger.

I doubt that we'll ever see that kind of statement: good as it is, the EyeOne Pro is not meant for *that* level of scientific precision.

But it works well within the tolerances that we are comfortable with in the printing and proofing applications that we use it for.

On the other hand, if scientific precision is what we're after, we cannot reasonably expect a sub-$1,000 instrument to match a multi-thousand dollar reference-grade spectroradiometer, or even come close to it.

In other words, if you buy a Toyota, don't expect to win the Indy 500 with it... <g>

Marco Ugolini
 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Accuray of EyeOnePro
      • From: Klaus Karcher <email@hidden>
  • Prev by Date: Re: Accuray of EyeOnePro
  • Next by Date: Re: Accuray of EyeOnePro
  • Previous by thread: Re: Accuray of EyeOnePro
  • Next by thread: Re: Accuray of EyeOnePro
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread