Re: CMYK is CMYK is CMYK (again)
Re: CMYK is CMYK is CMYK (again)
- Subject: Re: CMYK is CMYK is CMYK (again)
- From: Louis Dery <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2008 22:24:39 -0400
Roger,
On Apr 1, 2008, at 10:17 PM, Roger Breton wrote:
Louis,
GRACOL are NOT printing sepcifications but a METHOD to meet the ISO
specs.
OK. I keep hearing of the "G7" method and GRACoL is not a standard
but a
printing specifications. Unless I got Don wrong?
Flexo, silk-screen or nay… to aim the SAME CIELab values as SWOP and
GRACOL? Are you serious!
Absolutely. Talk to Dupont and Bill Whitfield. It's already happened.
Flexo ink for label, film, ??
FTA is supporting the G7 method, NOT matching the CIELab value of
offset ink… I hope!
Not sure about that. The CIELab values are up for anyone to grab.
Why stop
at calibrating a press to the NDPC when you can also have the inks
ISO-12647-2:2005 compliant!
Ok, and for example, why limit the gamut of silkscreen ink to the
gamut of offset press when you can profit of its extended gamut to
better match saturated colors?
Louis
Roger Breton
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
40tglc.com
This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden