• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: DICOM curve with spectraview
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: DICOM curve with spectraview


  • Subject: Re: DICOM curve with spectraview
  • From: Klaus Karcher <email@hidden>
  • Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2008 14:39:52 +0200

Roger Breton wrote:
But if we do chose a monitor calibration to match the RGB "gamma" or
transfer function we mostly work with, aren't we making our system less
device independent?

No -- not less device independent IMO, but optimized for the data we mostly work with (least banding / loss off tone levels).


What about CMYK? If we use brandX CMYK more often, would you chose a monitor
calibration to match the flavor of CMYK we mostly work with?

Probably not but I read opinions on other lists that CMYK have "inherent"
supposedly "natural" or "logical" TRC? I know it sounds crazy to say that
"sheetfed printing" has a gamma of 1.8, at least on the face of it.

One can compare the TRC of a printing process with gamma curves or other transfer functions and conjecture that converting between similar curves results in less loss of tone levels, but there are several pitfalls:


- there is no single TRC for C, M, Y, and K -- they are different
- simply counting lost values does not account for the visual weighing / importance of the lost steps
- simply comparing the primary TRCs falls short of the complex relations between RGB, CMYK and our vision. E.g. the loss of a certain tone level in the Y-channel of a CMYK image might be completely invisible in a pure yellow gradient, but distracting in a gray- green- or blue gradient.


Here are two plots to clarify some of the points mentioned above. They show the normalized TRCs of C, M Y and K in FOGRA39 compared to various Gamma functions (dashed lines) and Y(L*) (dotted, gray line).

with linear axes:
http://digitalproof.info/colorsync-users/TRCs/FOGRA39-Gamma-LStar.pdf

and with a logarithmic Y-axis:
http://digitalproof.info/colorsync-users/TRCs/FOGRA39-Gamma-LStar-log.pdf

They show that the judgment upon which of the curves go best with each other depends on the Y-scaling.

Klaus Karcher
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


References: 
 >Re: DICOM curve with spectraview (From: Roger Breton <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: DICOM curve with spectraview
  • Next by Date: Re: BaseLin files
  • Previous by thread: Re: DICOM curve with spectraview
  • Next by thread: Re: *****SPAM***** Re: DICOM curve with spectraview
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread