Lists

Open Menu Close Menu

Terms and Conditions
Lists hosted on this site
Email the Postmaster
Tips for posting to public mailing lists

Re: Spectro #'s vs PS #'s

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Spectro #'s vs PS #'s

Subject: Re: Spectro #'s vs PS #'s
From: Thomas Holm/pixl <email@hidden>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 10:35:24 +0200

On 22/04/2008, at 06.23, Busher Jr Richard C wrote:

I now print this file to my proofer. I do this by converting the cmyk file (US Sheetfed Coated v2) to the color space of my proofer (Epson 9800, K3 inks, Epson Standard Proofing Paper, ColorBurst rip profiled for ink and paper) using relative intent and black point compensation.

If you convert the file from CMYK > CMYK using BPC you are unlikely simulate what will happen on press as the lightness will be scaled to the blackest black on the printer (not the blackest black of the press). It is likely that the black you can attain on your proofer is darker than what's on press. I would suggest AbsCol instead.


Best Regards

Thomas Holm / Pixl Aps

- Colour Management Consultant
- Seminars speaker and tutor on CM and Digital Imaging etc.
- Ugra Certified Expert/Consultant: Process Standard Offset
- Apple Solutions Expert
- Member, ColorManagementGroup.com

- www.pixl.dk · email@hidden
--

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden



References:  
  >Spectro #'s vs PS #'s (From: Busher Jr Richard C <email@hidden>)




Prev by Date:
Re: maclife.de

Next by Date:
Fwd: Was  Designers etc , now Photographers etc

Previous by thread:
Spectro #'s vs PS #'s

Next by thread:
Re: Spectro #'s vs PS #'s

Index(es):

Date
Thread