• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
ISO 12647-7 "tolerances"
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

ISO 12647-7 "tolerances"


  • Subject: ISO 12647-7 "tolerances"
  • From: Kevin Muldoon <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 16:12:23 -0400

Look, a system can be optimized to a particular reference ... to very low DeltaEs, but this is to some degree dependent on which reference it is.

Some degree dependent? 100% degree dependent. Color management is all about creating CMYK numbers to match a color reference.


Paper is still an issue, and a numerically perfect proof may be visually unacceptable to the customer.

A proof that doesn't match final press output (or vice-versa) is unacceptable. A client who doesn't like a press-accurate proof is an opportunity for more color corrections.


A laminate proofer addresses this pretty well, but it won't give the super-wow numbers you're floggong

A laminate proofer will most certainly reach 'super-wow' tight DeltaE numbers. Laminate proofers such as the Kodak Approval have always had a much wider gamut than the presses they were meant to emulate. As an example, we have an XP4 running 03 media and a DVL for GRAoL and, as verification, we measure the entire GRACoL IT8.7/3 and run each patch reading through DeltaE program (dCIE1994) to see how far we are away from target values. Our average Delta E for thousands of patches is perhaps 1.2 and no one patch has strayed beyond a 3.5.


The REAL optimization problem is meeting as many of the customer's needs as possible without failing on any one objective, keeping the cost reasonable, and the training and maintenance issues within practical limits.

If the proof doesn't closely match a standard (regardless of how easy it is for the customer to operate the proofer) then it's not a proof. If you are suggesting sacrificing tight color standards for ease of use, cost, reliability and maintenance, then perhaps we're not talking apples to apples. I feel that measuring success upon the 'happiness of the customer' as salesmen often do is quite often a mistake. Ethics demands that the customer is given not only what he wants but what he needs as well.


--
Kevin Muldoon, Owner
TrueBlueDot - Fine Art Printing
New Haven, CT 06511
email@hidden
www.truebluedot.com
"Our pigment meets your imagination"



_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


  • Prev by Date: Re: Designers, Color Management, and Xrite , some thoughts and comments.
  • Next by Date: Re: ISO 12647-7 "tolerances"
  • Previous by thread: Re: ISO 12647-7 "tolerances"
  • Next by thread: Re: ISO 12647-7 "tolerances"
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread