• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Colour management and photographers - another perspective.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Colour management and photographers - another perspective.


  • Subject: Re: Colour management and photographers - another perspective.
  • From: Marco Ugolini <email@hidden>
  • Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 10:27:01 -0700 (GMT-07:00)

CDTobie wrote:

>In a message dated 4/24/08 4:33:44 AM, email@hidden writes:
>
>> If you're making profiles for photo as opposed to portrait use, I'd
>> suggest using few patches: Your aim is smoothness rather than
>> accuracy.
>>
>
>I don't find this logic to play out in reality. Fewer patches often miss
>levels, causing loss of detail or exaggerated contrast.

I agree with David. I fail to see the logic in Edmund's suggestion.

If anything, more patches *increase* smoothness, with skin tones as well, as long as the profiling application does a good job of interpolating the intermediate values between sample points -- which are always fewer than the number of potential colors in the profile.

Marco Ugolini
 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

  • Prev by Date: Re: ColorPort to MonacoProfiler
  • Next by Date: Re: Colour management and photographers - another perspective.
  • Previous by thread: Re: Colour management and photographers - another perspective.
  • Next by thread: Re: Colour management and photographers - another perspective.
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread