Re: Mac Leopard profile issue.
Re: Mac Leopard profile issue.
- Subject: Re: Mac Leopard profile issue.
- From: "edmund ronald" <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 1 May 2008 01:01:28 +0200
The network load should go down as you're not sending rasterised
bitmap patterns over Ethernet anymore, and the other Macs will run
faster as they don't need to rasterize.
The printer itself can hang off ONE old Mac by USB, or Ethernet, that
Mac effectively becomes a RIPMac, and then other Macs can send their
files to the print queue RIPMac by ethernet.
I think all you need to do is just switch Printer Sharing on on the
Mac with the old OS.
At least I think so, it all needs testing. It's the way things are
usually done on Unix networks, though, and I had that stuff up and
running several times in the past.
Edmund
On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 12:38 AM, J. Craig Sweat <email@hidden> wrote:
> The printer is ethernet-connected and both (sometimes three and even four)
> workstations are in fairly heavy use (some busy printing) regularly. Remote
> printing ties up to much network and processor energy to be used routinely
> in this case. It's a good suggestion just the same.
> Thanks Edmund.
>
>
>
> J. Craig Sweat Photography, Inc.
>
> 1026 S. Perry
>
> Spokane, WA 99202
>
> 509-534-8020
>
> jcsp.net
>
>
> On Apr 30, 2008, at 3:20 PM, edmund ronald wrote:
> Maybe keeping the old existing configuration and remote printing to
> the old Mac would solve your problems ?
>
>
> Edmund
>
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 11:50 PM, J. Craig Sweat <email@hidden> wrote:
> I am new to this list but not to color management. My apologies if I breach
> some protocol. I have been very successful with making paper profiles with
> an i1 spectrophotometer for my Epson 7600. It has done as advertised-
> reduced my tests/wastage and calibrated several studio monitors regularly.
> All of my current profiles were built from and for a system 10.4(+) Mac. I
> bought a new 8-processor (system 10.5 + current updates) Intel Mac and
> imported the paper profiles from the 10.4 machine and they produce prints
> with darker shadow areas (blocked-up, really) when I print with the same
> profiles but from the new machine. Mid-tones and highlights are close but
> the shadows and blacks seem stretched down too dark and the print is
> correspondingly more contrasty. In concept the promise of a calibrated,
> closed-loop workflow like i am describing should have consistent results
> from the same profile. Unless the printer driver (or the OS?) has changed
> the way it uses the profile. The prospect of creating multiple profiles for
> each paper/printer combo to suit each workstation becomes an impractical
> time-eater. Does anyone have any insight or similar experience?
>
> J. Craig Sweat Photography, Inc.
> 1026 S. Perry
> Spokane, WA 99202
> 509-534-8020
> jcsp.net
>
> _______________________________________________
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>
>
> This email sent to email@hidden
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden