Re: Smarter RIPS
Re: Smarter RIPS
- Subject: Re: Smarter RIPS
- From: email@hidden
- Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 15:04:43 EST
In a message dated 2/7/08 1:24:45 PM, email@hidden writes:
The present system, used by most RIP makers, is kind
> of silly - print a test pattern and "look" at it to see when the ink
> bleeds.
> There are a lot of points that can be chosen using this system, and its not
> very scientific or repeatable. It seems like the ink limitation choice is a
> critical first step that is done in very cavalier fashion.
>
Given that channel ink limit (as well as total ink limit, and assorted
cross-channel limits) may be determined by bleed, mottling, bronzing, saturation
max, D-max, or other factors such as strange little hooks or reversals, the
need to actually have a knowledgable individual look at the results, as well as
the numbers, to determine optimal values is not so unreasonable... writing the
algorithm to determine this automatically would be a challenge.
C. David Tobie
WW Product Technology Manager
Digital Imaging & Home Theater
Datacolor
email@hidden
www.datacolor.com/Spyder3
>
**************
Biggest Grammy Award surprises of all time on AOL Music.
(http://music.aol.com/grammys/pictures/never-won-a-grammy?NCID=aolcmp00300000002
548)
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden