• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Photoshop Gamut warning vs ColorThink
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Photoshop Gamut warning vs ColorThink


  • Subject: Re: Photoshop Gamut warning vs ColorThink
  • From: Mark McCormick-Goodhart <email@hidden>
  • Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 16:52:26 -0500


Lars Borg writes on Fri, 22 Feb 2008 22:51:46 -0800

A "gamut warning" indicates whether a specified source color can be
"reproduced accurately ...

Harald Bolls' reply

After giving some more thought to the above statement I would contend that
it is not a succinct definition of a gamut alarm.


Rather I think it would be a concise description for a new kind of alarm,
say one called a "Color Alarm".



These comments cemented the final piece of the puzzle for me. Photoshop's Gamut Warning is very useful, but its description is simply a misnomer. As suggested by Harald Boll, et al, it should be called a "Color Alarm" or "Color Error" warning rather than Gamut Warning. When using AbScol and BPC unchecked in the Color Settings conversion dialogue box, the PS gamut warning feature alerts the user with its overlay to any colors that have been mapped from source to destination with approximately 5dE or more error. The ambiguity of the tool's meaning occurs when one turns on the BPC feature or chooses RELcol or Perceptual rendering intents. This choice confounds the meaning of the overlaid gamut warning, or rather, "color error" warning because PS is first applying the rendering and BPC corrections to image data before comparing the "before and after" results with its gamut warning algorithm. The end user then sees colors with no warning that are often well beyond 5dE if one truly compares original source colors against output colors. For example, if I set BPC on and move an RGB 0,0,0 = LAB 0,0,0 working space black value to a matte inkjet paper Max black value of LAB 19,0,0, BPC first transforms the source data to within 5dE (LAB =14,0,0) before pushing the value through the gamut warning algorithm. So, no warning occurs. The source color black is now considered within the printer/ink/paper allowable tolerance, but I have no direct way of really knowing via info tool behavior, what total shift in color acutally occurred. To find out the actual color change values, I have to resort to work-arounds involving conversion to profile and then LAB mode, etc. That sort of defeats the dynamic warning sensibility of the gamut warning feature, so I use PS gamut warning in the more constrained role of checking ABScol color transformation errors. Although not the total functionality I'd like to see, this utility is still very instructive.


Thanks to everyone for much insight on this interesting PS feature. Now back to lurk mode!

Mark McCormick-Goodhart
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


  • Prev by Date: Re: Photoshop Gamut warning vs ColorThink
  • Next by Date: Re: Photoshop Gamut warning vs ColorThink
  • Previous by thread: Re: Photoshop Gamut warning vs ColorThink
  • Next by thread: Re: Photoshop Gamut warning vs ColorThink
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread