Re: U.S. Web Coated (SWOP)v2 vs. SWOP2006_Coated5v2
Re: U.S. Web Coated (SWOP)v2 vs. SWOP2006_Coated5v2
- Subject: Re: U.S. Web Coated (SWOP)v2 vs. SWOP2006_Coated5v2
- From: Terence Wyse <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 22:30:29 -0500
AMEN!
Device Links...we've need support for these for quite some time
without the need to purchase plug-ins to add this support.
As for the Classic/Custom CMYK engine, I wish they'd offer the ability
to use real characterization data sets or simply drop the ability to
build these kludgey CMYK profiles that are of questionable quality for
real print production.
Terry Wyse
On Jan 4, 2008, at 8:20 PM, Andrew Rodney wrote:
And it may be too much to ask of Adobe but can we finally lose the
old,
buggy Classic CMYK engine and have it replaced with at least the
ability to
work with device links natively inside of Photoshop?
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden