Re: SWOP3 and SWOP5, profiling issues.
Re: SWOP3 and SWOP5, profiling issues.
- Subject: Re: SWOP3 and SWOP5, profiling issues.
- From: Jim Mitchell <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 22:14:40 -0500
- Thread-topic: SWOP3 and SWOP5, profiling issues.
Terry Wrote
"My mistake Roger. I realize now where I've seen it before. It's been
cross-posted on the GRACoL Experts list and the Printing Across
Borders List I believe. Apparently the answers given over there
weren't good enough!"
Terry, you're absolutely right. I did post this on the pab forum.
Unfortunately I didn't get a good answer other than try and build your
profile again. The fact still remains that I got different results from
different profiling packages. I can understand if I was using a stripped
down cheap profiling package but I'm not. I'm willing to admit that what I
call significant another person might just call it being picky. Maybe it's
because ProfileMaker does a better job neutralizing the curves than Monaco.
All I know is that when using the SWOP 5 dataset with Monaco, the shadow
areas on fleshtones break harder than when I use ProfileMaker.
Jim
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden