Lists

Open Menu Close Menu

Terms and Conditions
Lists hosted on this site
Email the Postmaster
Tips for posting to public mailing lists

Re: UCR/GCR revisited

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: UCR/GCR revisited

Subject: Re: UCR/GCR revisited
From: Ray Maxwell <email@hidden>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 15:40:11 -0700

Paul Foerts wrote:

sRGB = "bad" isn't it? Well, there are bad, good and "excellent" quality examples of sRGB images. Can you imagine digital photography without sRGB?

Well...yes, I would love to have never heard of sRGB. You need to read up on the history of this "standard". In addition, most cameras that put sRGB in their EXIF tags were not even close to sRGB.

Will the ISO standard printing conditions get accepted or
will the "house-standards" prevail?
ICC color management cannot survive without standards.

I believe there is a market for both, printing to standards, and wide gamut, high density, and using more than CMYK inks.

ICC methods allow you to do both. It is possible for a printer to made a custom separation profile and provide it to the art creators.

Ray Maxwell

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden



References:  
  >UCR/GCR revisited (From: Paul Foerts <email@hidden>)




Prev by Date:
Re: UCR/GCR revisited

Next by Date:
Re: HP's joins the 30" extended gamut club

Previous by thread:
UCR/GCR revisited

Next by thread:
UCR/GCR revisited

Index(es):

Date
Thread