• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
gamma 1.8 vs gamma 2.2
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

gamma 1.8 vs gamma 2.2


  • Subject: gamma 1.8 vs gamma 2.2
  • From: Gabriel Graubner <email@hidden>
  • Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 13:03:49 -0700

Hello,
This brings up a question of gamma. I have always understood that on a Mac with a color managed system, the choice is to use 1.8 gamma. This I have always done and have not run into a problem. Recently, I used an outside printing source for Epson 11880 output. The recommendation was to use a gamma of 2.2. The image was printed out of Photoshop and because of that, I chose not to "mess" with my gamma setting as I had been outputting my images on my 7000 and never had a problem. The 11880 print was fine for color but darker than it should have been. Your comments are appreciated.



Safari is going to either use embedded sRGB profiles or assume the non
tagged or embedded images to use your monitor profile as source (colours)
profile. So on other's systems it will look different depending on their
default set up.
So Photoshop will have to assume something, which you'll likely assign sRGB
when opening, thus it is also then run through the monitor profile.
I get identical results here on Tiger with both tagged (embedded) or not.


Flash however doesn't use any ICC conversions as far as I know, but I just
did a quick test and Flash Player follows the changes in Monitor setup as
does Safari with different monitor gammas profiles.


Photoshop however does not. When I change to a gamma 1.8 profile when
updating the image in Photoshop CS3 the image goes darker than Flash or
Safari.


I tried applying the monitor profile in Photoshop as well and it is only
when a profile with a gamma around 2.2 is chosen do the colours and density
appear the same in all three; Flash, Photoshop, and Safari.


Firefox 3 now has a plug-in for color managed windows with ICC profiles,
just I could not get it to install.






Neil Snape

_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: This email sent to email@hidden
  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: gamma 1.8 vs gamma 2.2
      • From: Ray Maxwell <email@hidden>
  • Prev by Date: Re: Safari & Photoshop Differences
  • Next by Date: Re: gamma 1.8 vs gamma 2.2
  • Previous by thread: CIELAB color difference calculator
  • Next by thread: Re: gamma 1.8 vs gamma 2.2
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread