• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: LaCIE 319, 320
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: LaCIE 319, 320


  • Subject: Re: LaCIE 319, 320
  • From: Roger Breton <email@hidden>
  • Date: Sun, 04 May 2008 16:37:18 -0400

Just a quick follow-up on my LaCIE 319 and 320 rant.

It turned out that, in the BlueEye Calibrator software, users are given
effective control over luminance, color-temperature and gamma. Great.

But I remember what frustrated me, at the time, was the apparent limit to
which those monitors could actually be calibrated to in terms of luminance.

Any luminance request < 140 cd/m2 to the software was honored, as I recall.

But anything over 140 was "ignored". The software allowed the user to enter
any silly value (e.g.400) for luminance but then ignore them when
calibrating -- no upper limit warning of any kind.

Which was a problem at the time of testing IDEAlliance conformity ; how to
get true 160 cd/m2 out of these monitors still eludes me.

> I'm using a LaCie 321 colour-managed with ColorEyes Display, parameters at
> D65, L*, 110cd and I find it on the whole satisfactory.
>
> Mark

Roger Breton


 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

  • Prev by Date: Re: mac-epson profiling
  • Next by Date: Re: Profile verification in PatchTool
  • Previous by thread: Kenneth Hogrefe/AE/DuPont is out of the office.
  • Next by thread: OT: Color of Topics
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread