Re: X-Rite ColorMunki experience
Re: X-Rite ColorMunki experience
- Subject: Re: X-Rite ColorMunki experience
- From: ColorBurst Systems <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 08 May 2008 15:39:42 -0400
Hi Scott,
You're absolutely correct. ProSumer and even Avid ProSumer are appropriate.
I don't know that I could meet Gracol/Swop Certification with new
Media ICC Profiles built from ColorMunki, and that was the
distinction that I was trying to make.
We are looking into being able to use ColorMunki for re-Linearization
of our Gracol/Swop Certified ENV/Profiles (www.Swop.org) that are
built w/ SpectralVision Pro w/ 2989 patches.
There's a very good chance this will calibrate an Epson Printer
within specs for submitting Proofs to the Print House. Our Epson
Bundled - ColorBurst Edition can not have new Media ICC Profiles
added but it can have a new Lin file. If this works w/ ColorMunki,
it's an economical solution for Ad Agencies and Design Studios.
Regards,
Larry Spevak
ColorBurst
At 12:27 PM 5/8/08, Scott Martin wrote:
On May 8, 2008, at 9:55 AM, ColorBurst Systems wrote:
Generally, the finished Print from ColorMunki's ICC Profile is "
Very Good + " but not "Excellent". For most people, it will be more
than adequate, especially in the Photo and Fine Art markets.
Those in the Photo and Fine Art markets might understandably take
that the wrong way! :-] I personally find a good portion of the fine
art market to be among the most advanced and demanding users out
there. Isn't a fair percentage of your product aimed at the photo
and fine art markets? Perhaps you should say "the average user",
"prosumer" or somesuch.
I also agree that the munki profiles are very good but not as
excellent as what I'm seeing with MP using larger targets.
Scott Martin
<http://www.on-sight.com>www.on-sight.com
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden