Re: G7 press calibration, best press conditions or average?
Re: G7 press calibration, best press conditions or average?
- Subject: Re: G7 press calibration, best press conditions or average?
- From: John Romano <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2008 06:54:13 -0500
- Thread-topic: G7 press calibration, best press conditions or average?
Paul
Why is a 50% not a 50% Bothering you ? If your so worried about it
Make a split colorbar ....top half as a bitmap 50% that will not be affected
By your plate curve.
Also from my experience if you have your presses in good working condition
Set up to the manufacturers specs then you wont need independent curves for
Each press. Also your plates will have IDs on them and if you Did need
independent curves you could easily tell what they were ...No mixed up
plates.
Yes Marco .....splitting hairs and stirring the pot !
John R
On 11/3/08 5:23 PM, "Paul Foerts" <email@hidden> wrote:
> The G7 methodology may help you to aim at an ISO printing condition but it
> may also ruin your control patch references. A 50% patch may no longer be a
> 50% patch...
>
> If the images are printing OK, no problem. If something is wrong, the search
> may get daunting! (presses with different curves -> mixed-up plates...)
>
> Paul
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden