Re: G7 press calibration, best press conditions or average?
Re: G7 press calibration, best press conditions or average?
- Subject: Re: G7 press calibration, best press conditions or average?
- From: "Richard Apollo" <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 12:34:35 -0600
> Yes it does, thank you very much. I have no problem with G7 as an
> optional methodology. What is troubling is the marketing of G7 in so
> much as printers of reputation must adopt it, or else suffer the
> marketing consequences. It isn't that it is bad methodology - it's
> that there are other methods that are equally satisfactory. G7 is
> ok. But, it's marketing and promotional philosophy for certification
> is, in my view, yet another "join the club", exclusionary based
> approach.
I would argue that other methods are not equally satisfactory. By defining tonal response in absolute terms (density or L*) and by defining (and correcting) gray balance the G7 method provides a clearer, more complete target to aim for.
Rich Apollo
Prepress Mgr
Oklahoma Offset, Inc.
email@hidden
918-732-8168
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden