• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: 16-bit Printing
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 16-bit Printing


  • Subject: Re: 16-bit Printing
  • From: Scott Martin <email@hidden>
  • Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 22:23:58 -0600


On Nov 19, 2008, at 4:08 PM, Fleisher, Ken wrote:

I have not seen any results from one of these printers that can accept a
full 16-bits/channel and I’m wondering if those of you who have experience
with them, can you describe what you have seen? Do you feel there is any
real benefit to printing a full 16-bit image? Can you actually “see” a
difference? If so, is it a significant difference?


Excellent question. The Canon iPF printers have offered high bit depth printing for years via their Photoshop printing plug-in. Since Bill Atkinson's targets are 16-bit, one can use his targets to profile the printer in it's high bit depth mode. For the sake of simplicity, let's call these 16-bit, profiles (even though one can make 16 bit profiles from 8 bit targets). When I make evaluation prints from 8-bit profiles in 8-bit mode and 16-bit profiles in 16-bit mode on these printers I can see a difference, but it's really minor. I can even see a difference when I profile the 16-bit mode using 8 and 16 bit 1728 patch targets. A granger rainbow gains smoothness when a high bit depth mode is profiled using a high bit depth target. I think it's quite unlikely that you would ever see this difference in a real photograph.

So I'm tempted to conclude that high bit depth printing translates into almost no quality improvements for the common end user. Technically there is an improvement but it's not worth bragging about. I do, however, suspect that the importance of printer bit depth could increase with expanding print gamuts due to new papers and inksets.

Another issue that warrants further examination is the bit depth of each printer's on board processing of the incoming data. Processing a full 16 bits on the fly requires a significant amount amount of processing power relative to processing 8 or 12 bit data. I've spoken with engineers at Epson, HP and Canon about this issue. Contact me offlist if you'd like to discuss this further.

Scott Martin
www.on-sight.com









_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: 16-bit Printing
      • From: Robert Krawitz <email@hidden>
References: 
 >16-bit Printing (From: "Fleisher, Ken" <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: ICC Profile needed
  • Next by Date: Re: 16-bit Printing
  • Previous by thread: 16-bit Printing
  • Next by thread: Re: 16-bit Printing
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread