• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
BPC + Perceptual + ISO Newspaper v4
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

BPC + Perceptual + ISO Newspaper v4


  • Subject: BPC + Perceptual + ISO Newspaper v4
  • From: Roger Breton <email@hidden>
  • Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 16:28:04 -0500

Eric,

What you're reporting is most shocking to me and repeatable.

Granted, what Adobe does with Photoshop is Adobe's business but I never
thought they could process an image through the Perceptual tag in a way that
I don't understand. Unless there are provisions for this in the ICC specs I
missed, or maybe this is one of the pernicious effects of applying BPC in
XYZ, what you described is 100% true -- and sad.

To compare, I opened the same ISO Newspaper v4 profile in X-Rite's
ProfileEditor (should we say X-Rite ProfileEditor or GretagMacbeth
ProfileEditor now?) and, what I'm getting is along the lines I thought I'd
be getting in Photoshop, that is 240% TIL when plain using the Perceptual
tag with or without BPC checked.

Incidently, the RelCol or even AbsCol tags, in ProfileEditor, also yield
240% TIL.

So this is clearly a case of an unforeseen effect of BPC on my part and IFRA
does well to warn users about it. I'll learn to beware in the future too.

Regards / Roger

> Roger,
> Agree with you on that, although the instruction from IFRA did stress
> the Perceptual / BPC off combination in order to achieve the 240% TAC
> target.
> I had assumed it was ReCol BPC on, but that gives this low 215% TAC
> value, although I actually prefer the look of the conversion. Truth is
> with this target condition the amount of degrading that has to come
> from the substrate used means you have to be pretty brutal, there's
> not really the opportunity to be subtle!


__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature
database 3651 (20081129) __________

The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com


 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

References: 
 >Re: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 5, Issue 413 (From: Eric Nunn <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 5, Issue 413
  • Previous by thread: Re: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 5, Issue 413
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread