• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
RE: CCFT versus LED [was: Spectros better than colorimeters
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: CCFT versus LED [was: Spectros better than colorimeters


  • Subject: RE: CCFT versus LED [was: Spectros better than colorimeters
  • From: Roger Breton <email@hidden>
  • Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 18:06:33 -0400

Tom,

> I have seen differences between a photoresearch pr650 and a Minolta CS
> 1000 greater than 0.01 with respect to an xy measurement of LED
> chromaticity.

The 650 has an 8nm resolution while the 1000 has a 1nm resolution. Could
that explain the difference?

Roger


__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature
database 3557 (20081026) __________

The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com


 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

References: 
 >CCFT versus LED [was: Spectros better than colorimeters (From: email@hidden)

  • Prev by Date: CCFT versus LED [was: Spectros better than colorimeters
  • Next by Date: SWOP Proof Certification, TRxxx Characterization Data
  • Previous by thread: CCFT versus LED [was: Spectros better than colorimeters
  • Next by thread: SWOP Proof Certification, TRxxx Characterization Data
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread