Re: Can DeviceLink conversions be better? was: Can this be done?
Re: Can DeviceLink conversions be better? was: Can this be done?
- Subject: Re: Can DeviceLink conversions be better? was: Can this be done?
- From: MARK SEGAL <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2008 15:58:28 -0700 (PDT)
Yes and no. If we process an image in a colour space wider than that of the display, the display cannot show all the colours in the image. There is clipping in the display image. But nothing outside the display gamut is clipped. All those colours are still there. When we view the image on a wider gamut display, or print them using a wider gamut inkset, those colours will be revealed to the limit of the output colour space, not the narrower display colour space. Is this what you meant?
Mark
----- Original Message ----
From: Klaus Karcher <email@hidden>
To: colorsync-users <email@hidden>
Sent: Monday, September 1, 2008 6:37:11 PM
Subject: Re: Can DeviceLink conversions be better? was: Can this be done?
As long as you have an "usual" monitor (whose gamut roughly corresponds
to sRGB), a large portion of working spaces like Adobe- or eci-RGB,
offset or injkjet gamuts is not representable dependably. Photoshop
usually uses the relative colorimetric intent with black point
compensation to transform from the image- to the display colorspace.
This means everything outside your monitor's gamut gets clipped.
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden