Re: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 5, Issue 292
Re: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 5, Issue 292
- Subject: Re: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 5, Issue 292
- From: Chris Cox <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2008 19:14:40 -0700
- Thread-topic: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 5, Issue 292
Adobe is very much committed to providing better quality, which is why we
had to go with something beyond the current ICC standard.
Adobe documented the problems with the current standard, documented the
extensions necessary, documented the file format, provided an SDK, provided
an editor, and asked for continued discussion. How much farther can Adobe
go to providing interoperability and the quality that our customers demand?
Of course, the details any specific business proposal would be covered by an
NDA.
Chris
On 9/8/08 5:13 AM, "email@hidden"
<email@hidden> wrote:
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2008 03:22:27 +0200
> From: "edmund ronald" <email@hidden>
> Subject: Re: Media Testing for maclife.de
> To: "Mark Segal" <email@hidden>
> Cc: "'colorsync-users?lists.apple.com' List"
> <email@hidden>
> Message-ID:
> <email@hidden>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> Mark,
>
> It's an open secret in the industry that camera profiling doesn't
> work well. There is some technology out there to solve the problem,
> namely computing the camera response on the fly from good data about
> the sensor and the scene lighting. Adobe was approached with a request
> to allow this to interoperate with their product, they slammed the
> door. They have absolutely no interest in delivering better quality to
> their users - the present state suits them quite well. And in fact,
> the ACR model does at least as well as anything else out there, if you
> want a simple model.
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden